Thought you owned that copy of WoW? Think again
By Jennifer Reichle
Thought you owned that copy of WoW? Think again. A recent district court case found that World of Warcraft users do not own the software they purchase, but merely license it.
The case is MDY v. Blizzard. Glider, created by MDY, is a program (better defined as a “bot”) that “plays” World of Warcraft automatically. It doesn’t use hacks and won’t let your character move at super speed. It just performs tasks that any person can perform gaining experience points; just without any human interaction. Essentially the user can go to school or work while their character is leveling up at home.
There is a six part test for a violation under 17 U.S.C.S §1201(a)(2) that the party alleging a violation must prove:
1. That they own a valid copyright on the work
2. That the work is effectively controlled by a technology measure, which is now being circumvented
3. That third parties can now access;
4. That the copyright owner has not authorized it;
5. That this was done by a product in which the defendant either: designed or produced primarily for circumvention, made available despite only limited commercial significance other than circumvention, or marketed for use in circumvention of the controlling technological measure;
6. That it infringes or facilitates infringing a right protected by the copyright act.
First, Blizzard did own a valid copyright on the dynamic non-literal elements of WoW; when fighting the monster, encountering another in town, viewing the scenes with wolves, etc. Second, WoW is effectively controlled by something called Warden that is being circumvented by Glider. Warden has two software components: one that scan the computer before logging onto the Blizzard server to determine whether any unauthorized programs are running and another that runs periodically throughout the game to make sure that no unauthorized programs are running. Glider circumvents Warden so the bot can be used. Third, Glider allows third parties to access the dynamic non-literal elements of the game. Fourth, Blizzard has not authorized the access. Fifth, Glider was designed to circumvent Warden. Blizzard has altered Warden twice to allow it to catch Glider users, thus banning the users from playing. Each time MDY alters Glider to allow it to run unnoticed by Warden. Glider would have no commercial significance if it did not circumvent Warden. Also it is marketed as to the point that it circumvents Warden. Sixth it infringes or facilitates infringing a right protected by the Copyright Act?
If you’re playing Full Tilt poker and are using a poker odds calculator, that’s infringing a right protected by the Copyright Act. If you put Adobe Photoshop on your home and laptop computer and a colleague uses it, that’s infringing a right protected by the Copyright Act. So be sure to read the EULA before you click I agree and adhere to every line. Because like Microsoft says, “The software is licensed, not sold.”
No related posts.
Recent Blog Articles
- Conference — Worldwide Patent Statistics for Forecasting Technology-Related Activities
- October 27 & 28 – Free Inventors Conference Presented by USPTO
- Native American Artists and Craftsman: GAO Discusses Violations and Lack of US Enforcement
- Trademark Monitoring Scam: Don’t get dooped
- Obama administration proposes stricter IP laws
- Are you getting sued? What getting a Cease and Desist letter means for you.
- What does ‘Use in Commerce’ mean in your USPTO trademark application?
- FCC issues new Net Neutrality rules
- USPTO Extended Missing Parts Pilot Program: Lay-A-Way Option Available to December 7, 2011
- The Battle over Network Neutrality May Finally Be Hitting Your Monthly Bill as Comcast and Netflix Provider Spar
- Facebook Continues its Litigation Trend – The Next Target: Lamebook
- Calculating Damages for Copyright Infringement
- Architectural Copyrights – When a building is more than the sum of its parts.
- Rosetta Stone Gears up for a Battle Against Google and the Future of Adwords
- New Rules Proposed on Gene Patenting
- 4chan and the Internet Dispense Justice as They See Fit
- A Thin Line Between Artistry and Architecture
- Speech Crimes: How talking on the Internet can get you into trouble
- Virginia Imagination Made Real EXPO for Innovators
- Trademark Abbreviations & The Public Use Doctrine
- American Indian (4)
- Business (69)
- Charities (1)
- Copyright Articles (34)
- Architecture (1)
- Government Contracting (9)
- Internet (2)
- Inventor & Entrepreneur Updates (64)
- law (22)
- Online Privacy (11)
- Patent Articles (50)
- Press release (6)
- trademark (25)
- Trademark Articles (28)
- U Decide (1)
- Uncategorized (14)