Obama Administration’s use of State Secrets Procedures
The Obama Administration announced in September that they will institute a new policy on the State Secrets Procedures. The State Secrets Procedures grants the government permission to withdraw certain pieces of evidence from court cases if the government believes that it will reveal sensitive and classified information to the public.
Attorney General Eric Holder issued a memorandum to the Department of Justice about the new policies regarding the State Secrets Procedures, in hopes of attaining higher levels of accountability and transparency within the department. “This policy is an important step toward rebuilding the public’s trust in government’s use of this privilege while recognizing the imperative need to protect national security. It sets out clear procedures that will provide greater accountability and ensure that the state secrets privilege is invoked only when necessary and in the narrowest way possible.” The need for greater accountability lends from past grievances from critics of the Bush Administration’s use of the State Secrets Procedures in numerous court cases throughout the administrations term.
The reaction to the new policy implementations by the Obama administration have been one of frustration. Many feel that the new procedures for the use are inefficient because they only add more bureaucratic measures without reforming the actual implementation of the measure. However, the Obama administration has claimed that it will only use the State Secrets Procedure in cases of “significant harm” to national security and the administration advocated that they would not use to procedure to cover government wrongdoings and abuses.
One of the critics’ biggest issues with the new policy on State Secret Procedures is the issue of maintaining the system of checks and balances established in the Constitution. Some people worry that the executive branch has invoked too much power over the court system by having the authority to omit certain items of evidence in cases. Critics believe that the courts should be entrusted with sensitive materials and more importantly they must have a check on the power of the executive branch. In order to address this issue, there is a need for legislative reform advocated by Congress. So far, two pieces of legislation have been introduced in the House and Senate which will address the issues with the State Secrets Protection Act,
No related posts.
Recent Blog Articles
- Conference — Worldwide Patent Statistics for Forecasting Technology-Related Activities
- October 27 & 28 – Free Inventors Conference Presented by USPTO
- Native American Artists and Craftsman: GAO Discusses Violations and Lack of US Enforcement
- Trademark Monitoring Scam: Don’t get dooped
- Obama administration proposes stricter IP laws
- Are you getting sued? What getting a Cease and Desist letter means for you.
- What does ‘Use in Commerce’ mean in your USPTO trademark application?
- FCC issues new Net Neutrality rules
- USPTO Extended Missing Parts Pilot Program: Lay-A-Way Option Available to December 7, 2011
- The Battle over Network Neutrality May Finally Be Hitting Your Monthly Bill as Comcast and Netflix Provider Spar
- Facebook Continues its Litigation Trend – The Next Target: Lamebook
- Calculating Damages for Copyright Infringement
- Architectural Copyrights – When a building is more than the sum of its parts.
- Rosetta Stone Gears up for a Battle Against Google and the Future of Adwords
- New Rules Proposed on Gene Patenting
- 4chan and the Internet Dispense Justice as They See Fit
- A Thin Line Between Artistry and Architecture
- Speech Crimes: How talking on the Internet can get you into trouble
- Virginia Imagination Made Real EXPO for Innovators
- Trademark Abbreviations & The Public Use Doctrine
- American Indian (4)
- Business (69)
- Charities (1)
- Copyright Articles (34)
- Architecture (1)
- Government Contracting (9)
- Internet (2)
- Inventor & Entrepreneur Updates (64)
- law (22)
- Online Privacy (11)
- Patent Articles (50)
- Press release (6)
- trademark (25)
- Trademark Articles (28)
- U Decide (1)
- Uncategorized (14)