Loosening the Specimen Requirements for Trademark Applications
Filed under: Inventor & Entrepreneur Updates, law, trademark, Trademark Articles
By Ed Nunes, W&M Law class of 2010
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit handed down a decision overturning a decision by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) to refuse the mark “One Nation Under God” for charity bracelets (opinion available here). The decision broadens the standard set out in Lands End, Inc. v. Manbeck, 797 F.Supp. 511 (E.D. Va. 1992), which required a picture of the product for web-based trademark specimens.
The Old Standard
Chapter 37 of the Code of Federal Regulations, section 2.56(b)(1) states “A trademark specimen is a label, tag, or container for the goods, or a display associated with the goods. The Office may accept another document related to the goods or the sale of the goods when it is not possible to place the mark on the goods or packaging for the goods.” 37 CFR 2.56(b)(1).
Websites are often refused as proper specimens for trademarks because websites they are used as advertising for a product, and thus are refused as only servicemarks may use advertisements as specimens.
Lands End, Inc. v. Manbeck and Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure (TMEP) section 904.06, however, set a standard where websites could be used for trademarks, as long as three criteria were met:
- There is a relevant picture of the good,
- The trademark is sufficiently close to the good so that consumers will associate the good with the trademark, and
- The page includes all the information necessary to order the goods.
The Case at Hand
Michael Sones submitted an application to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) attempting to register the mark “One Nation Under God” in connection with “charity bracelets”. For a specimen of Sones’ mark he used a web page complying with requirements two and three under TMEP 904.06, but failing to show a picture of the good.
Click on Trademark Specimen to see what was submitted.
No related posts.
Recent Blog Articles
- Conference — Worldwide Patent Statistics for Forecasting Technology-Related Activities
- October 27 & 28 – Free Inventors Conference Presented by USPTO
- Native American Artists and Craftsman: GAO Discusses Violations and Lack of US Enforcement
- Trademark Monitoring Scam: Don’t get dooped
- Obama administration proposes stricter IP laws
- Are you getting sued? What getting a Cease and Desist letter means for you.
- What does ‘Use in Commerce’ mean in your USPTO trademark application?
- FCC issues new Net Neutrality rules
- USPTO Extended Missing Parts Pilot Program: Lay-A-Way Option Available to December 7, 2011
- The Battle over Network Neutrality May Finally Be Hitting Your Monthly Bill as Comcast and Netflix Provider Spar
- Facebook Continues its Litigation Trend – The Next Target: Lamebook
- Calculating Damages for Copyright Infringement
- Architectural Copyrights – When a building is more than the sum of its parts.
- Rosetta Stone Gears up for a Battle Against Google and the Future of Adwords
- New Rules Proposed on Gene Patenting
- 4chan and the Internet Dispense Justice as They See Fit
- A Thin Line Between Artistry and Architecture
- Speech Crimes: How talking on the Internet can get you into trouble
- Virginia Imagination Made Real EXPO for Innovators
- Trademark Abbreviations & The Public Use Doctrine
- American Indian (4)
- Business (69)
- Charities (1)
- Copyright Articles (34)
- Architecture (1)
- Government Contracting (9)
- Internet (2)
- Inventor & Entrepreneur Updates (64)
- law (22)
- Online Privacy (11)
- Patent Articles (50)
- Press release (6)
- trademark (25)
- Trademark Articles (28)
- U Decide (1)
- Uncategorized (14)